Cebur nuju daging

Ukum

Saking Wikipédia

Hukum umat punika seperangkat awig-awig sane kakaryanin lan prasida kalaksanayang olih lembaga sosial utawi pemerintah anggen ngatur parilaksana, [1][2] antuk definisi sane tepat dados pikobet sane sampun sue kaperdebatkan. [3] [4] [5] Sampun mabinayan katelatarang pinaka ilmu [6] [7] lan pinaka seni keadilan. [8] [9] [10] Awig-awig sane kamargiang olih negara prasida kakaryanin olih legislatif, ngawetuang awig-awig ; olih sang malaksana malarapan antuk dekrit miwah pararem ; utawi antuk pamutus hakim, sane dados preseden ring yurisdiksi hukum umum . Otokrat prasida ngamargiang fungsi punika ring wewidangannyane. Pakaryan hukum punika prasida kaiusin olih konstitusi, kasurat utawi meneng, miwah hak-hak sane kakodekan ring tengahnyane. Hukum punika ngwangun politik, ekonomi, sejarah lan masyarakat antuk makudang-kudang cara lan taler mawiguna dados mediator paiketan pantaraning jadma.

Sistem hukum mabinayan pantaraning yurisdiksi, antuk pabinayannyane sane kaanalisis ring hukum komparatif . Ring yurisdiksi hukum sipil, legislatif utawi badan pusat tiosan sane ngamargiang kodifikasi miwah ngukuhang hukum. Ring sistem hukum umum, hakim prasida ngaryanin hukum kasus sane ngiket malarapan antuk preseden, [11] yadiastun ring galah-galah puniki prasida kagentosin olih pengadilan sane tegehan utawi legislatif. [12] Hukum agama kaanggen ring makudang-kudang komunitas agama lan negara, lan sampun manut sejarah ngicenin iusan ring hukum sekuler. [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]

Ruang lingkup hukum prasida kakepah dados kalih domain: hukum publik sane mapaiketan sareng pemerintah lan masyarakat, rumasuk hukum konstitusi, hukum administrasi, lan hukum pidana ; sedengkan hukum swasta mapaiketan sareng wicara hukum pantaraning pihak ring widang-widang sekadi kontrak, arta brana, pelanggaran, delik lan hukum komersial . [18] Pabinayan puniki pinih kukuh ring negara-negara hukum sipil, utamanyane sane madue sistem pengadilan administrasi sane mabinayan ; [19] [20] tungkalikannyane, pabinayan hukum publik-swasta kirang kacingak ring yurisdiksi hukum umum. [21] [22]

Hukum ngicenin sumber penyelidikan ilmiah ring sejarah hukum, [23] filsafat, [24] analisis ekonomi [25] lan sosiologi . [26] Hukum taler ngawetuang pikobet sane mabuat miwah kompleks ngenenin indik pepadan, keadilan, miwah keadilan. [27] [28]

Cingak taler

[uah | uah wit]

Lis pustaka

[uah | uah wit]
  1. "Hukum". BASAbaliWiki (ring Inggris). 2020-05-02. Kaaksés 2025-05-26.
  2. Robertson 2006, p. 90.
  3. Willis 1926.
  4. Gibbs, Jack P. (1968). "Definitions of Law and Empirical Questions". Law & Society Review. 2 (3): 429–446. doi:10.2307/3052897. ISSN 0023-9216. JSTOR 3052897.
  5. Akers, Ronald L. (1965). "Toward a Comparative Definition of Law". Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 56 (3): 301–306. doi:10.2307/1141239. ISSN 0022-0205. JSTOR 1141239. Kaarsipin saking versi asli tanggal 19 July 2018. Kaaksés 3 January 2020.
  6. Spooner, Lysander (1882). Natural Law; or The Science of Justice: A Treatise on Natural Law, Natural Justice, Natural Rights, Natural Liberty, and Natural Society; Showing that All Legislation Whatsoever is an Absurdity, a Usurpation, and a Crime. Part First. A. Williams & Co. Kaarsipin saking versi asli tanggal 31 December 2019. Kaaksés 31 December 2019.
  7. Núñez Vaquero, Álvaro (10 June 2013). "Five Models of Legal Science". Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law / Revija za ustavno teorijo in filozofijo prava (ring Inggris) (19): 53–81. doi:10.4000/revus.2449. ISSN 1581-7652. Kaarsipin saking versi asli tanggal 31 December 2019. Kaaksés 31 December 2019.
  8. Cohen 1992.
  9. Rubin, Basha (13 January 2015). "Is Law an Art or a Science?: A Bit of Both". Forbes. Kaarsipin saking versi asli tanggal 3 November 2018.
  10. Berger 1953, p. 525.
  11. Mason, Anthony (1996). "The Judge as Law-maker" (PDF). James Cook University Mayo Lecture. Kaarsipin (PDF) saking versi asli tanggal 31 December 2019. Kaaksés 31 December 2019.
  12. "Congressional Responses to Judicial Decisions". Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court. Gale MacMillan. 2008. pp. 400–403. Kaarsipin saking versi asli tanggal 31 December 2019. Kaaksés 31 December 2019.
  13. Berman, Harold J. (1983). "Religious Foundations of Law in the West: An Historical Perspective". Journal of Law and Religion. Cambridge University Press. 1 (1): 3–43. doi:10.2307/1051071. JSTOR 1051071.
  14. Fox, Jonathan; Sandler, Shmuel (1 April 2005). "Separation of Religion and State in the Twenty-First Century: Comparing the Middle East and Western Democracies". Comparative Politics. 37 (3): 317. doi:10.2307/20072892. JSTOR 20072892.
  15. Cox, Noel (2001). "Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in the Church of the Province of Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia". Deakin Law Review. 6 (2): 262. Kaarsipin saking versi asli tanggal 31 December 2019. Kaaksés 31 December 2019.
  16. Otto, Jan Michiel, ed. (2010). Sharia incorporated: a comparative overview of the legal systems of twelve Muslim countries in past and present. Leiden University Press. ISBN 9789087280574.
  17. Raisch, Marylin Johnson. "Religious Legal Systems in Comparative Law: A Guide to Introductory Research – GlobaLex". New York University School of Law. Kaarsipin saking versi asli tanggal 31 December 2019. Kaaksés 31 December 2019.
  18. Horwitz, Morton J. (1 June 1982). "The History of the Public/Private Distinction". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 130 (6): 1423–1428. doi:10.2307/3311976. JSTOR 3311976. Kaaksés 3 January 2020.[dead link]
  19. Merryman, John Henry (1968). "The Public Law-Private Law Distinction in European and American Law". Journal of Public Law. 17: 3. Kaarsipin saking versi asli tanggal 12 February 2020. Kaaksés 3 January 2020.
  20. Saiman, Chaim N. (6 July 2008). "Public Law, Private Law, and Legal Science". American Journal of Comparative Law (ring Inggris). Social Science Research Network. 56 (961): 691–702. doi:10.5131/ajcl.2007.0023. Kaarsipin saking versi asli tanggal 28 April 2020. Kaaksés 3 January 2020.
  21. Harlow, Carol (1 May 1980). ""Public" and "private" law: definition without distinction". The Modern Law Review (ring Inggris). 43 (3): 241–265. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1980.tb01592.x. ISSN 1468-2230.
  22. Samuel, Geoffrey (1 September 1983). "Public And Private Law: A Private Lawyer's Response". The Modern Law Review (ring Inggris). 46 (5): 558–583. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1983.tb02534.x. ISSN 1468-2230. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  23. Gordley, James (16 November 2006). Reimann, Mathias; Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.). "Comparative Law and Legal History". The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (ring Inggris): 752–774. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.013.0024. ISBN 9780199296064. Kaarsipin saking versi asli tanggal 31 December 2019. Kaaksés 31 December 2019.
  24. Bor, Fredric L. (1974). "The nexus between philosophy and law". Journal of Legal Education. 26 (4): 539–543. ISSN 0022-2208. JSTOR 42896964.
  25. Rubin, Paul H. "Law and Economics". The Library of Economics and Liberty. Liberty Fund, Inc. Kaarsipin saking versi asli tanggal 2 July 2019. Kaaksés 31 December 2019.
  26. Banakar, Reza (2003). Merging law and sociology : beyond the dichotomies in socio-legal research. Berlin/Wisconsin: Galda and Wilch Publishing. ISBN 1-931255-13-X.
  27. Pound, Roscoe (1914). "The End of Law as Developed in Legal Rules and Doctrines". Harvard Law Review. 27 (3): 195–234. doi:10.2307/1325958. ISSN 0017-811X. JSTOR 1325958.
  28. Sarat, Austin; Kearns, Thomas, eds. (1996). Justice and Injustice in Law and Legal Theory. University of Michigan Press. pp. 18–19. doi:10.3998/mpub.10283. ISBN 9780472096251. JSTOR 10.3998/mpub.10283.